Meredith v. City of Winter Haven
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.
Appellants are holders of City of Winter Haven general refunding bonds, issue of 1933. Alleging that the defendants were proposing to call the bonds for payment but refusing to pay the deferred or accumulated interest as provided for therein, they brought this suit for a declaratory decree adjudicating and determining that this may not be done, and an injunction restraining defendants from attempting to do so, and, in the alternative, if this relief may not be had, for a declaration that plaintiffs are entitled to be subrogated to, and assume, the position, as to…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Chicot County Drainage District v. Baxter State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Gelpcke v. DubuqueSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
- Oklahoma Packing Co. v. Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Meredith v. Winter HavenSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Meredith v. City of Winter HavenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944
- In re Florida East Coast Ry. Co.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1943
- Selser v. City of StuartCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1943
- Board Of Supervisors Of Louisiana State University And Agricultural And Mechanical College v. TureaudCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.