Legal Opinion

Renicks v. City of Lake Worth

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided July 11, 1944PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, J.:

In 1936 the City of Lake Worth refunded its outstanding indebtedness, evidently incurred between 1914 and 1927, by issuing securities designated “Refunding Bonds, Series A.” The city authorities again decided to refund the debt and determined that on 1 August 1943 $3,781,200 remained unpaid, $3,681,900 in the hands of creditors and $99,300 in the possession of a trust company for delivery to the holders of bonds of the original issue in exchange for their securities. Eventually a decree was sought of the circuit judge validating and confirming issuance of the proposed bonds, titled…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. County of CitrusSupreme Court of Florida · 1934
  2. State v. County of SarasotaSupreme Court of Florida · 1935
  3. Taylor v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Florida · 1940
  4. Andrews v. City of Winter HavenSupreme Court of Florida · 1941
  5. State v. City of VeniceSupreme Court of Florida · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Penn v. PENSACOLA-ESCAMBIA GOVERNMENT. CTR. AUTH.Supreme Court of Florida · 1975
  2. Pensacola-Escambia Governmental Center Authority v. State, Circuit Court of the 1st Judicial Circuit of Florida, Escambia County1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API