Legal Opinion

Hartman v. Hallmark Cards, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided February 27, 1986No. 85-3157-CV-S-4PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

RUSSELL G. CLARK, District Judge.

Defendant Hallmark Cards, Inc. has filed a motion for summary judgment on all counts. Plaintiff has filed a motion to strike the affidavit of Hallmark in-house counsel Judith Whittaker. Defendant’s motion for summary judgment will be granted. Plaintiff’s motion to strike affidavit will be denied.

The Court notes that the same issues raised by defendant Hallmark’s motion for summary judgment are also applicable to defendant Mattel; however, there is no motion pending filed on behalf of Mattel.

On May 6, 1985, the plaintiff filed a seven count complaint…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Nichols v. Universal Pictures CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
  3. Truck Equipment Service Company, Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Fruehauf Corporation, Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
  4. Litchfield v. SpielbergCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  5. Gee v. CBS, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1979

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hartman v. Hallmark Cards, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
  2. Kelly v. L.L. Cool J.District Court, S.D. New York · 1992
  3. Carell v. Shubert Organization, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2000
  4. Arista Records LLC v. GreubelDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2006
  5. Franklin Electronic Publishers, Inc. v. Unisonic Products Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API