Legal Opinion
Federal Grain Co. v. Hayes Grain & Commission Co.
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided November 12, 1923PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Hart, J.,
(after stating the facts). The main reliance for a reversal of the judgment by counsel for the defendant is that the court erred in giving instruction No. 1 at the request of the plaintiff. The instruction is as follows:
“No. 1. If you believe from the evidence that the grade fixed at Kansas City upon the oats involved in this lawsuit was so erroneous or so far from the true grade as to be the result of a gross mistake, your verdict will be for the plaintiff.”
It will be noted by reading the contract, which we have copied in our statement of facts, that the parties have agreed upon an…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hot Springs Ry. Co. v. MaherSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1886
- Carlile v. CorriganSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907
- Lanier v. Little Rock Cooperage Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
- Ozan Lumber Co. v. HaynesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1900
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bartlett & Company, Grain v. The Merchants Company, the Merchants Company v. Bartlett& Company, GrainCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
- Hayes Grain & Commission Co. v. Federal Grain Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. SmithDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1948
- Hill v. ConeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
- Purse Brothers v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.