Legal Opinion

Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Smith

District Court, W.D. Arkansas

Decided January 14, 1948No. Civil Action No. 718PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN E. MILLER, District Judge.

On March 7, 1947, the plaintiff filed its-complaint in the Fayetteville Division against the defendant and two other persons doing business as Litteral Canning Company and also individually against the defendant Clarence T. Smith.

The case was transferred to the Fort Smith Division on April 15, 1947, and or, April 28, 1947, the plaintiff upon notice dismissed the complaint as against the defendants J. W. Cain and G. A. Coulter, leaving only the defendant Clarence T. Smith.

In the complaint the plaintiff seeks tO' recover the sum of $6,747.25 with interest on…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Ryan v. Progressive Grocery Stores, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. Hoe v. . SanbornNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  3. Carleton v. . Lombard, Ayres Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1896
  4. Hargous v. . StoneNew York Court of Appeals · 1851
  5. Bierman v. . City Mills Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1897

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. H. R. Henderson & Co.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1955
  2. Lewis v. Jackson & Squire, Inc.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1949
  3. Bartlett & Company, Grain v. The Merchants Company, the Merchants Company v. Bartlett& Company, GrainCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
  4. Smith v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API