Legal Opinion
Hill v. Cone
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided March 19, 1928PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STATEMENT OF FACTS.
The appellants, the board of trustees of the Arkansas Tuberculosis Sanatorium, brought this suit against the Auditor of State for a mandamus to compel him to issue to them a warrant for $6,000, the balance alleged to have been appropriated for the sanatorium under acts Nos. 21 and 351 of the Acts of the General Assembly of 1927, and incidentally to determine what amount, if any, was still due the contractor, George W. Fair, for the construction of the hospital at the Tuberculosis Sanatorium.
The hospital at the sanatorium was destroyed by fire on January 13, 1926, and on…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. GleasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Ripley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Boston Store v. SchleuterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
- Robbins v. PlantSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
- Carlile v. CorriganSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- American Surety Co. v. Kinnear Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1932
- In re LammersDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1962