Legal Opinion

Marks v. Brown

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 6, 1905No. 1,121PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAWLEY, District Judge.

This is a petition for a writ of mandamus to compel the District Judge of Alaska, Division No. 1, to vacate a judgment entered by him July 22, 1904, and to enforce the judgment rendered by him in the case of Antone Marks v. James M. Shoup, as United States marshal for Alaska. The original judgment in the District Court of Alaska in favor of Marks was for the sum of $3,390.35, with costs, and bore interest at the rate of 8 per cent, per annum. From this judgment an appeal was taken to this court, and the judgment was thereafter affirmed and a mandate issued. Upon receipt…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Story v. LivingstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
  2. Milwaukie & Minnesota Railroad v. SoutterSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
  3. Kindel v. Beck & Pauli Lithographing Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1893
  4. Packard v. Kinzie Avenue Heights Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Rousset v. BoyleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ford v. Ford (In Re Ford)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon · 1993
  2. Luther Bailey v. Lee Henslee, Superintendent of Arkansas State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
  3. Luther Bailey v. Lee Henslee, Superintendent of Arkansas State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
  4. Mozley v. PotteigerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API