Mozley v. Potteiger
New Mexico Supreme Court
1DissentHudspeth, J.
I am unable to concur in the opinion of the court. In reviewing the lower court’s action, I take it we should be guided by the rule stated in State Trust & Savings Bank et al. v. Hermosa L. & C. Co., 30 N. M. 566, 240 P. 469, 477, as follows: “Our review is for the correction of an erroneous result, rather than merely to approve or disapprove the grounds on which it is based.”
The trial court correctly designated the complaint in this ca-se as “an ordinary bill in equity seeking the foreclosure of a mechanic’s lien, and praying for a deficiency judgment.” If the trial court’s interpretation of…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- State Trust & Savings Bank v. Hermosa Land & Cattle Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1925
- Young v. VailNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1924
- Bemmerly v. WoodwardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Johnson v. City of Santa FeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1930
- Summerford v. Board of Com'rs.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1931
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.