Legal Opinion
Ford v. Ford (In Re Ford)
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon
Decided August 5, 1993No. 19-60588PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ELIZABETH L. PERRIS, Bankruptcy Judge.
The plaintiff creditor had a viable objection to the debtor’s receiving a discharge but was unable to timely pursue the objection because the debtor neither scheduled the debt nor notified the plaintiff of the bankruptcy until 19 months after the bankruptcy was filed. The plaintiff seeks a judgment declaring the debt nondischargeable under § 523(a)(3)(A) 1 , and denying the debtor’s discharge under § 727. The United States intervened pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2403(a) because Constitutional issues arose. I have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc. v. PopeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Texaco, Inc. v. ShortSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- In Re Gilbert G. BEEZLEY, Debtor. Gilbert G. BEEZLEY, Appellant, v. CALIFORNIA LAND TITLE COMPANY, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Fogal Legware of Switzerland, Inc. v. Wills (In Re Wills)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Roberts v. Erhard (In Re Roberts)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Olympic Coast Investment, Inc. v. Wright (In Re Wright)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Montana · 2007
- Paine v. Griffin (In Re Paine)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Wiersma v. O.H. Kruse Grain & Milling (In Re Wiersma)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.