Legal Opinion

Houston v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided January 12, 1962No. 342-59PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam ;

Plaintiff brings this suit under section 14 of the Veterans Preference Act (58 Stat. 387, 390; 5 U.S.C. § 863) for loss of pay for his alleged wrongful discharge. Defendant, after having answered denying the crucial alie-*40gations of the petition, filed a motion for summary judgment, on the ground that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact, and that plaintiff is not entitled to recover as a matter of law. It says he is not entitled to recover as a matter of law for two reasons: first, that he is collaterally estopped by a judgment of the District Court for the District…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Washington Times Co. v. BonnerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1936
  2. Armand v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956
  3. Peoples Life Insurance v. TalleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1936
  4. Sinclair Refining Company v. FullerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
  5. Kenny v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Richard D. Meehan v. John W. MacY Jr., Chairman, Civil Service CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
  2. Joseph Swaaley v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
  3. Chambers v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1971
  4. Michael G. Heffron v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
  5. Charles R. Armstrong v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API