Legal Opinion

Sinclair Refining Company v. Fuller

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 25, 1935No. 4-3713PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMehaffy, J.

The appellee, Homer Fuller, was in the employ of the appellant as a commission agent in the Hope, Arkansas, territory from November 10, 1930, until April 7, 1931. During that time he operated under two contracts, but they were identical except as to the amount of commissions. Under the contracts he was required to receive, care for and sell g’as, oils, lubricants and other products for appellant. He was not to extend credit to any customers without permission in writing from appellant. It was also his duty to assist in collecting the accounts in his territory, and to make reports daily or as…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Christy v. ElliottIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. BridwellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  3. Bohlinger v. Germania Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
  4. Coalgate Co. v. BrossSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  5. Missouri Pacific Railroad Co. v. RemelSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Erhart v. HummondsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1960
  2. Scholtes v. Signal Delivery Service, Inc.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1982
  3. Braman and the Gus Blass Co. v. WalthallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
  4. Houston v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
  5. HYUNDAI MOTOR FINANCE CO. v. McKAY MOTORS I, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API