Legal Opinion

Celeste v. Industrial Commission

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 19, 1990No. 1-90-0468 WCPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McCULLOUGH

The issue before us is whether an employee who seeks review of an Industrial Commission (Commission) decision must file a bond to confer subject-matter jurisdiction upon the circuit court. We hold there is no such statutory requirement.

This dispute arose as the result of proceedings which occurred after this court remanded the case to the Commission following a prior appeal. (Celeste v. Industrial Comm’n (1988), 165 Ill. App. 3d 1156 (unpublished order under Supreme Court Rule 23).) Upon remand, claimant filed a motion for interest which was not heard prior to the time respondent paid the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Baum v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Nierman v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. ZamboleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  4. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Otis Elevator Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Illinois Graphics Co. v. NickumIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Residential Carpentry, Inc. v. KennedyAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  3. Illinois State Treasurer v. Illinois Workers' Compensation CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2014
  4. Illinois State Treasurer v. The Illinois Workers' Compensation CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2013
  5. Illinois Graphics Co. v. NickumAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API