Legal Opinion

Nierman v. Industrial Commission

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1928No. 18385. Judgment affirmedPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice DeYoung

On November 17,. 1925, William C. Cobb suffered injuries while employed by S. J. James on a building belonging to Henry Nierman and Charles Hirtenstein. Death resulted from the injuries. Omah Cobb, the widow, filed a claim for compensation with the Industrial Commission. On March 24, 1926, an arbitrator awarded her $14 per week for 267-6/7 weeks, or a total of $3750, of which, it was provided, $2660 had already accrued, and the balance should be paid in weekly installments. The Industrial Commission, on review, sustained the arbitrator’s award. Nierman and Hirtenstein filed in the office of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Central Illinois Public Service Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Baum v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Tribune Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Peabody Coal Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Otis Elevator Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Interlake Steel Corp. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Village of Glencoe v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1933
  3. American Car & Foundry Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Elles v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Sweitzer v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1946

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API