Legal Opinion

People in Interest of PAM

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided May 14, 1998No. 97CA1335PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge BRIGGS.

L.V.M. (mother) appeals from a judgment entered by the juvenile court terminating the parent-child legal relationship between her and her child, P.A.M. We affirm.

I

Mother contends the juvenile court erred in finding that the Blood tribe of Canada was not entitled to notice of the dependency or neglect proceeding, pursuant to the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978, 25 U.S.C. § 1901, et seq. (1978)(ICWA). We find no error.

In a state court proceeding for termination of parental rights, notice must be sent to the tribe of any child the court has reason to know is an “Indian…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, In the Interest of M.M., a Child, and concerning C.M.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  2. In re M.C.P.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1989
  3. Application of AngusCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  4. People Ex Rel. A.G.-G.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. In re B.R.B.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1986

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People ex rel. S.R.M.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. People Ex Rel. A.N.W.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. People ex rel. J.O.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. People Ex Rel. SrmColorado Court of Appeals · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API