Legal Opinion
In re Interest of M.K.D.A.L.
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided October 23, 2014No. Court of Appeals No. 14CA1662PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by JUDGE WEBB
¶ 1 This case presents a novel question under C.A.R. 4.2 -whether a trial court can certify sua sponte an issue for interlocutory review. Because C.A.R. 4.2(c) does not provide for such sua sponte action, we dismiss the petition to appeal.
I. Background
¶ 2 J.A.A.U., the biological father of M.K.D.A.L., petitioned under section 15-14-304(1), C.R.S.2014, for his appointment as a permanent guardian. According to the petition, "[r]espondent is unable effectively to communicate in the English language to the extent that he lacks the ability to satisfy essential requirements for…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Turbyne v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2007
- Willhite v. RODRIGUEZ-CERASupreme Court of Colorado · 2012
- People ex rel. StrodtmanColorado Court of Appeals · 2011
- Shaw Construction, LLC v. United Builder Services, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2012
- Hiner v. JohnsonColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, IN the INTEREST OF B.H., a Child, and Concerning D.H.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2022