Legal Opinion
Willhite v. RODRIGUEZ-CERA
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided April 23, 2012No. 11SA250PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Boatright
T1 In this original proceeding under C.A.R. 21, we review the trial court's order quashing service on Paulo Rodriguez-Cera, who resides in Mexico, but was served by substituted service in Colorado. After previously granting substituted service under C.R.C.P. 4(£), the trial court determined that C.RC.P. 4(d) mandated that service on a defendant located in a foreign country be made according to international agreement, if any. Because Mexico and the United States *1235are both parties to the Convention on Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil and Commercial Matters, Nov.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. SchlunkSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- People v. District Court, Second Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
- Nuance Communications, Inc. v. Abbyy Software HouseCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Hoen v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1966
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Ryan Ranch Community Ass'n, Inc. v. KelleySupreme Court of Colorado · 2016
- People in the Interest of J.O.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2015
- v. DIA Brewing CoSupreme Court of Colorado · 2021
- v. TaylorColorado Court of Appeals · 2018
- Ryan Ranch Community Ass'n v. KelleyColorado Court of Appeals · 2014
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.