Legal Opinion
Hiner v. Johnson
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided October 11, 2012No. 10CA1846PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge BERNARD.
1 1 This appeal concerns the application of C.R.C.P. 102. That rule authorizes courts to issue writs of attachment and describes the procedures for implementing them. Here, at the request of defendants, Dr. Bruce Johnson and Dr. Michael King, the trial court issued a writ attaching proceeds that had been obtained by plaintiffs, David A. Hiner and Deelila A. Quick, in a settlement with a defendant who is not part of this appeal. Subsequently, the trial court, at plaintiffs request, discharged the writ.
{2 The court then denied plaintiffs' request for damages, attorney…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. ShellSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
- Spahmer v. GulletteSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
- Effland v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2010
- Beeghly v. MacKSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
- Garcia v. MEDVED CHEVROLET, INC.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- and 15CA0203. DA Mountain Rentals, LLC v. The Lodge at Lionshead Phase III Condominium Association, IncColorado Court of Appeals · 2016
- Williams v. Rock-Tenn Services, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2016
- v. MillerColorado Court of Appeals · 2019
- L & R Exploration Venture v. CCG, LLCColorado Court of Appeals · 2015
- In re the Marriage of DadiotisColorado Court of Appeals · 2014
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.