Legal Opinion

Boston Athletic Association v. International Marathons

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided July 3, 1984PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLynch, J.

These two appeals present the question whether the president of the Boston Athletic Association (BAA), William T. Cloney, was authorized to enter into a certain contract with the defendant International Marathons', Inc. (IMI), by its president Marshall Medoff. This contract purported to designate IMI as the exclusive promoter of the Boston Marathon (Marathon).

Two rulings are before us: an interlocutory order granting the BAA’s request for a preliminary injunction, and a partial summary judgment in favor of BAA declaring the contract be tween the BAA and IMI void ab initio. 2 We affirm both…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Packaging Industries Group, Inc. v. CheneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  2. Cummings v. National Shawmut Bank of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  3. Guenard v. BurkeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  4. Lydia E. Pinkham Medicine Co. v. GoveMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  5. Stoneman v. Fox Film Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. J. A. Sullivan Corp. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  2. Estate of Moulton v. PuopoloMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
  3. Vermont Department of Public Service v. Massachusetts Municipal Wholesale Electric Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1988
  4. Wilson v. Commissioner of Transitional AssistanceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
  5. Commonwealth v. Nadal-GinardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1997

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API