Stoneman v. Fox Film Corp.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.
This is an action of tort for deceit. It was submitted to the jury upon three counts of the declaration which were not for the same cause of action. It was alleged in those counts in substance that in October, 1928, the defendant through its duly authorized agents represented to *420the plaintiff that it was interested in and controlled the Fox Northeastern Playhouses, Inc., and the Fox Metropolitan Playhouses, Inc., two corporations then recently formed, and was desirous of acquiring in the name of these corporations the leaseholds or fees in such moving picture theatres in New England as the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Continental Securities Co. v. . BelmontNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
- McQuade v. StonehamNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
- England v. DearbornMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
- Albert E. Touchet, Inc. v. TouchetMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
- DeBlois v. Boylston & Tremont Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Platten v. HG Bermuda Exempted Ltd.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
- Johnson v. WitkowskiMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1991
- Hurley v. OrnsteenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
- Agoos Leather Companies, Inc. v. American & Foreign InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
- Estate of Moulton v. PuopoloMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.