Legal Opinion

Hair v. City of Humboldt

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 9, 1931No. 29,723PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Smith, J.:

The action was to enjoin the enforcement of an ordinance of a city. The plaintiff alleged that it deprived him of the equal protection of the law in violation of the fourteenth amendment to the constitution of the United States, and was an abuse of the power to tax in contravention of article 12, section 5 of the constitution of Kansas. Judgment was for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.

*68Plaintiff, an honorably discharged veteran of the world war, owns and operates a bakery in Iola. He worked up quite a trade with various merchants in Humboldt.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re IrishSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
  2. In re Irish for a Writ of Habeas CorpusSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Cook Coffee Co. v. Village of FlushingMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Grantham v. City of ChickashaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  3. Johnson v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  4. Capital Gas & Electric Co. v. BoyntonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  5. Myers v. City of DefianceOhio Court of Appeals · 1940

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API