Pikunse v. Kopchinski
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
ROWLEY, President Judge.
Following a bench trial in the instant landlord-tenant dispute, Steven and Michael Kopchinski (hereinafter “appellants”), appeal from a judgment entered against them, and in favor of Barbara Pikunse, (hereinafter “appellee”). The two (2) issues which have been presented for our review are: (1) whether appellee met her burden of proof at trial regarding the value of her personal property which was converted by appellants; and (2) whether the trial court’s award of punitive damages is adequately supported by the evidence. Having carefully reviewed the record in light of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Feld v. MerriamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Delahanty v. First Pennsylvania Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Chambers v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Pugh v. HolmesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Rizzo v. HainesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Pennsylvania Department of General Services v. United States Mineral Products Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Paves v. CorsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Witherspoon, W. v. Wright, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
- DEPT. OF GEN. SERV. v. US Mineral Prod.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Nexus Real Estate v. Erickson, J., Appeal of: JLBSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.