Legal Opinion

McReynolds v. Smith

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 1909No. 21,131PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Prom Howard Circuit Court; J. F. Elliott, Judge. Suit by Alzora N. Smith and others against William H. McReynolds and others. Prom a judgment for plaintiffs, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtHadley, J.

*3381. *337Appellees, being daughters of George W. Defenbaugh, brought this suit to prevent the probate of what purported to be the will, and codicil thereto, of their father. The defendants Elizabeth Defenbaugh and Wilbur M. Defenbaugh are the widow and minor son of the testator. The defendants McReynolds, Richmond, the General Convention of the New Church in the United States, and S. S. Seward, *338president of said last-named defendant, are trustees and beneficiaries under said will. The complaint alleges unsoundness of mind and undue influence. It is alleged that the decedent was of unsound mind on…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Burkhart v. GladishIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Teegarden v. LewisIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Roller v. KlingIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Steinkuehler v. WempnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Bower v. BowerIndiana Supreme Court · 1895

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Crawfordsville Trust Co. v. RamseyIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Barr v. SumnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Friedersdorf v. LacyIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Wilson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Love v. HARRISIndiana Court of Appeals · 1957

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API