Friedersdorf v. Lacy
Indiana Supreme Court
From Bartholomew Circuit Court, Marshall Hacker, Judge. Action by Lina Lacy and others against Conrad J. Friedersdorf and others. From a judgment for plaintiffs, defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
The will of Amelia Friedersdorf, after its probate, was adjudged invalid and void, at the suit of ap*431pellees, on the grounds that the testatrix was of unsound mind and the instrument unduly executed. The court submitted to the jury three interrogatories, answers to which were returned with the general verdict, to the effect that at the time of executing the will the testatrix was (1) of unsound mind, (2) unduly influenced, (3) laboring under an insane delusion which controlled her in making the will.
Appellants have jointly and severally assigned as errors the overruling of (1) their demurrers…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Pennsylvania Co. v. MarionIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Belt Railroad & Stock Yard Co. v. MannIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Bundy v. McKnightIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
- Rush v. MegeeIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
- Steinkuehler v. WempnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Barr v. SumnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1915
- Keys v. McDowellIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
- Davis v. BabbIndiana Supreme Court · 1919
- Workman v. WorkmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1943
- Breadheft v. ClevelandIndiana Supreme Court · 1915
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.