Legal Opinion
State v. Candy L.
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided June 24, 2003No. 23,048PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SUTIN, Judge.
{1} Candy L. (Child) appeals from an order directing her to make restitution for damage she caused to an electronic monitoring device. We dismiss the appeal as premature because it does not originate from a final order.
BACKGROUND
{2} Child was adjudicated delinquent and placed on supervised probation. Pursuant to a probation agreement signed by Child and her mother, Child agreed to “pay restitution on a schedule and in a manner required by [her] probation officer.” Child’s probation agreement expressly contemplated that the restitution schedule would be approved by and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kelly Inn No. 102, Inc. v. KapnisonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
- Britt v. Phoenix Indemnity InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
- B. L. Goldberg & Associates, Inc. v. Uptown, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1985
- Baca v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1996
- San Juan 1990-A., L.P. v. El Paso Production Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. VaughnNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
- Chavarria v. Fleetwood Retail Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
- Chavarria v. Fleetwood Retail Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
- State v. CattNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2018
- State v. CattNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2018
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.