Legal Opinion

Bennett v. Wilson

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided July 25, 1961No. 6393PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDtjeeey, P. J.

This is an appeal from a directed verdict for the defendants-appellees at the close of the plaintiff-appellant’s case. The principal issue is the application of the “loaned servant” doctrine to an employee of the defendant, who caused an injury to the appellant.

Appellant was an employee of the Savage Blacktop Company. Savage had jobs to install several blacktop residential driveways. It entered into a contract with the Bomar Company, a partnership, to supply Savage with a “highlift” and an operator to work on the excavations. Savage paid an hourly rate for the equipment and its operator,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Charles v. . BarrettNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
  2. Halkias v. Wilkoff Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Babbitt v. SayOhio Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Miller v. Metropolitan Life Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Giovinale v. Republic Steel Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1949

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Stinnett v. Halcore Group, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Gilmore v. Grandview Cement Products, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1962
  3. Cornelius v. B.G. Danis Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API