Legal Opinion
Southern Minnesota Construction Co. v. Minnesota Department of Transportation
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided January 2, 2002No. C4-01-999PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HARTEN, Judge.
Appellants, construction companies, brought a declaratory judgment action against respondent Minnesota Department of Transportation (MinnDOT), seeking a declaration that MinnDOT did not have the authority under Minn.Stat. § 177.44, subd. 7, to conduct independent administrative enforcement actions of the prevailing wage act, MinmStat. §§ 177.41-.44. Appellants contend that MinnDOT may only investigate violations and refer them to county attorneys for prosecution.1 The district court concluded that MinnDOT had authority to conduct enforcement actions but granted summary…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Brookfield Trade Center, Inc. v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- McKee v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- St. Paul Area Chamber of Commerce v. MarzitelliSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Thomas v. RambergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- Rice Lake Contracting Corp. v. Rust Environment & Infrastructure, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- AAA Striping Service Co. v. Minnesota Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
- Aaa Striping v. Mn. DotCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
- Financial Consulting, LLC v. Commissioner of InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2014
- SOUTHERN MN CONST. CO. v. Dept. of Transp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002