Legal Opinion

KNG CORP. v. Kim

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 2005No. 25038PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

ACOBA, J.

We hold that, before ordering that a rent trust fund pursuant to Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) § 666-21 (1993) be established, the district court of the first circuit (the court) should have held a hearing on the claim of Defendant-Appellant Carol Kim (Defendant), as tenant of outdoor spaces rented to her by Plaintiff-Appellee KNG Corporation (Plaintiff), that she was not al lowed to take possession of the said spaces. Because we remand the case, we conclude, for guidance of the court, that HRS § 666-21 does not violate the due process and equal protection…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Lindsey v. NormetSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Forgay v. ConradSupreme Court of the United States · 1848
  4. Baehr v. LewinHawaii Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Sandy Beach Defense Fund v. City CouncilHawaii Supreme Court · 1989

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. NicholsHawaii Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Kapuwai v. City & County of Honolulu, Department of Parks & RecreationHawaii Supreme Court · 2009
  3. HAWAII INSURERS COUNCIL v. LingleHawaii Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Cedillos v. Masumoto.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Hawaii Insurers Council v. LingleHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2008

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API