Legal Opinion

Kish v. Van Note

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1985No. C-2860PublishedCited by 124 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

GONZALEZ, Justice.

Our opinion and judgment of February 27,1985 are withdrawn and the following is substituted. The motion for rehearing is granted.

This is an appeal in a suit for damages for violations of the Texas Consumer Credit Code and for treble damages under the Deceptive Trade Practices Act. After a jury trial, the trial court denied recovery under the Consumer Credit Code, allowed a partial recovery under the DTP A, and allowed foreclosure of a lien on the property. In an unpublished opinion, the court of appeals affirmed. We reverse in part the judgments of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Brown v. American Transfer & Storage Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Smith v. BaldwinTexas Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Woo v. Great Southwestern Acceptance Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  4. Butler v. Joseph's Wine Shop, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1982
  5. Building Concepts, Inc. v. DuncanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by124 opinions

  1. Arthur Andersen & Co. v. Perry Equipment Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Parkway Co. v. WoodruffTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Usaa Texas Lloyds Company v. Gail MenchacaTexas Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Birchfield v. Texarkana Memorial HospitalTexas Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Waite Hill Services, Inc. v. World Class Metal Works, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998

119 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API