Legal Opinion

Howard v. Hale

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 24, 1942No. 34,903PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, C. J.:

This was an action by a judgment creditor of P. L. Hale to'set aside a quitclaim deed he and his wife had made in favor of their son, P. L. Hale, Jr. The cause of action alleged was that the conveyance was fraudulent as against the plaintiff.

It appears that on February 4, 1937, plaintiff filed an action in the district, court of Reno county against P. L. Hale and Emaline F. Hale to recover on three promissory notes executed by them. On April 15, 1937, judgment for $2,400.35 and interest and costs was rendered in favor of plaintiff.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Dunlap Stone & Lime Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1888
  2. Benson v. AltenburgSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  3. Achorn v. ParkerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  4. Byron State Bank v. CreekSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  5. Federal Land Bank v. TawzerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Raynolds v. RowSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
  2. Board of County Commissioners v. AbbottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API