Legal Opinion

Raynolds v. Row

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 16, 1959No. 41,377PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Fatzer, J.:

This is an appeal from an order of the district court sustaining defendants’ motion to dismiss the action upon the ground that it had no jurisdiction of the subject matter.

The plaintiff, Lillian Dee Raynolds, commenced this action on December 6, 1957, by filing her petition in the district court of Wilson county. Defendants’ demurrer thereto was sustained, and on March 20, 1958, plaintiff filed her first amended petition.

The petition, as amended, alleged that plaintiff was a resident of Kansas City, Kansas; that W. A. Row and Billie Row,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Martin v. BatteySupreme Court of Kansas · 1912
  2. Roberts v. CooterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
  3. Zane v. VawterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
  4. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. WynkoopSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  5. Black v. BlackSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ary Jewelers, L.L.C. v. KrigelSupreme Court of Kansas · 2004
  2. Farha v. Signal Companies, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1975
  3. Gray v. Amoco Production CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1977
  4. Roberts v. CooterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
  5. Nelson Energy Programs, Inc. v. Oil & Gas Technology Fund, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API