Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Dunlap Stone & Lime Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1888PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error from Morris District Cou/rt. The opinion states the ease.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Holt, C.:

The petition states as plaintiff’s cause of action, in substance as follows: On October 27,1883, the Dunlap Stone and Lime Company borrowed of the First National Bank of Emporia, Kansas, the sum of $1,500, and gave its note for that amount, and used the money in its business. The bank required sureties, and the company procured David Taylor, the plaintiff in error, also plaintiff below, W. P. Parr and W. W. Wheeler to sign said note as guarantors and sureties. Said company paid only a small portion of the note, and the bank brought suit for the balance on said note…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Armstrong v. KeiferIndiana Supreme Court · 1872

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ziska v. ZiskaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  2. Smith v. HensenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  3. Benson v. AltenburgSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  4. Byron State Bank v. CreekSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  5. Federal Land Bank v. TawzerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API