Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Noble

Montana Supreme Court

Decided August 2, 1963No. 10533Published

1Dissent

MR. JUSTICE DOYLE:

I dissent.

Perusal of the reasoning in the majority opinion would seem to turn on that hoary and frequently misused theory of law of stare decisis.

Analysis of the record and the Montana decisions in this case deprives the majority of sanctuary of that legal haven of justification for the decision herein.

From the very inception of appellate courts in this nation, when a substantial and fabulous miscarriage of justice occurred, the Bar would facetiously refer to such decision “as the best guess of the court of ultimate conjecture.”

*305Stare decisis is ordinarily a wise rule of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Durham v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
  2. Parsons v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
  3. United States v. Donald Kenneth CurrensCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961
  4. Raub v. CarpenterSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  5. United States Ex Rel. Smith v. BaldiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API