Legal Opinion

Gurley v. United Services Automobile Assoc.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided November 7, 1983No. 0002PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sanders, Chief Judge:

This is an action on an insurance policy for the loss of a tractor (and its attachments) which was stolen. Trial of the case resulted in a jury verdict for the respondents. The insurance company appeals, claiming its policy did not cover the stolen property as a matter of law. We affirm.

The tractor in question belonged to the respondent Gurley who loaned it to the respondents Neff from whose premises it was stolen. At the time of the loss, the Neffs had a policy with the insurance company which covered “personal property usual or incidental to the occupancy of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  2. Murphy v. HaganSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
  3. Gaskins v. Blue Cross-Blue ShieldSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
  4. Stevens v. Sun Publishing Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
  5. ARCHAMBAULT v. SprouseSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1951

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Samuel v. MouzonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  2. Dorman v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998
  3. Doe v. AsburyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  4. Cromer v. CromerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API