Legal Opinion

Cromer v. Cromer

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided August 10, 1987No. 1014PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Shaw, Judge:

Appellants, Donald E. Cromer (hereinafter Donald) and Harleysville Mutual Insurance Co. (hereinafter Harleysville) appeal a circuit court order finding respondent John C. Cromer (hereinafter John) entitled to one-half of the proceeds of insurance from the loss of a barn due to fire. The trial court held Donald and Harleysville were jointly and severally liable to John in the amount of $27,500 plus cost. We affirm.

*362While this court has jurisdiction to find facts based on its own view of the evidence in an equity matter, it is not required to disregard findings of the trial judge who…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. PEOPLES NAT'L BANK OF G'VILLE v. Manos Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1954
  2. Piana v. PianaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1961
  3. Gibbes MacHinery Co. v. Niagara Fire Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1922
  4. Allen v. AllenCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
  5. Steinmeyer v. SteinmeyerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1902

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Shebester v. Triple Crown InsurersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  2. Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC v. Riley (In re Riley)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2012
  3. Shebester v. Triple Crown InsurersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API