Doe v. Asbury
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Sanders, Chief Judge:
This is a suit arising out of a collision between an automobile driven by respondent Joe Ann Doe and a tractor trailer truck driven by appellant Asbury as the employee of appellant Ryder. The jury returned a verdict in favor of Doe. We affirm.
I
Asbury and Ryder first argue there was insufficient “creditable testimony as to the negligence and/or recklessness of appellant driver to warrant submitting the case to the jury.” In an action at law, the jurisdiction of this Court extends only to the correction of errors of law. A factual finding of the jury will not be disturbed…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
- Bennette v. HaderSupreme Court of Missouri · 1935
- Marks v. I. M. Pearlstine & SonsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1943
- Stevens v. Sun Publishing Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
- Willis v. Floyd Brace Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1983
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Brown Ex Rel. Estate of Brown v. StewartCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001
- Samuel v. MouzonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
- Southern Realty & Construction Co. v. BryanCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
- Williams v. LeventisCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
- Stallings v. RatliffCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.