Legal Opinion

Meenen v. Negley

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 3, 1923No. Appeal, No. 36PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

In this case a final hearing was had on a bill in equity for an injunction. The Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, on November 3, 1920, filed a formal adjudication, which, after stating, as conclusions of law, that “the pleadings and evidence do not make a cause cognizable in equity,” and “the bill should be dismissed,” ends thus: “In our opinion, the plaintiff’s remedy is by action at law; if counsel for plaintiff so desires, we will certify the cause to the law side of the court, otherwise a decree dismissing the bill will be entered.” On December 9, 1920, it was ordered…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Com. Ex Rel. Miller v. AsheSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Costley v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  3. Meenen v. NegleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  4. Montgomery v. Mahjoubian, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API