Legal Opinion

Costley v. Smith

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 23, 1923No. Appeal, No. 88PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Schaffeb,

Plaintiffs filed this bill in equity reciting that they had purchased a dwelling house from defendant in pursuance of a written agreement of sale therefor, had received the deed, and paid the full consideration; that, prior to the signing of the agreement, the defendant falsely and fraudulently represented to plaintiffs, as an inducement to their execution of it, that the walls of the house were of a certain thickness, that the roof was waterproof and that the joists and supporting beams were of a proper kind and character to make the dwelling safe, comfortable…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hogsett v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  2. Johnson v. SwankeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Kramer v. SlatterySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  4. Minnich v. KauffmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  5. Dech's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1868

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Moore v. McAllisterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958
  2. Schuster v. LargmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  3. Sixsmith v. MartsolfSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  4. Bishoff v. Valley Dairy Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  5. Heller v. FishmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API