Meenen v. Negley
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Keller, J.,
This is a complicated record. Appellant states in his history of the ease that “the parties have agreed upon a statement of the facts of the case under Superior Court Buie 56 and that statement is printed as part of the record in this case.” No such statement is contained in the record before us. The parties only agreed, in accordance with section 5 of the Act of May 11, 1911, P. L. 279, on what testimony should be included in the printed record, as relevant to the questions involved and to be argued in this appeal.
Appellant states four questions are involved: 1. Whether…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Smith & Fleek's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1872
- Beaver v. SlaneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- Findlay & Hay v. KeimSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1869
- Freeman v. LaffertySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
- Meenen v. NegleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
3Cited by3 opinions
- Orient Building & Loan Ass'n v. FreudSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- Com. of Pa. v. DaySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Walsh v. New Tioga Leader Building & Loan Ass'n, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1932