Legal Opinion

Brand v. Conner & McRae

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 7, 1934No. 1292PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FLEWELLEN, Special Associate Justice.

We adopt, as substantially correct, appellants’ statement of the nature and result of the case, which, with slight changes, is as follows:

“This case originated in the District Court of Eastland County and was instituted by *713Earl Conner and John D. McRae, composing the law firm of Conner & McRae. It was against James Shaw, Banking Commissioner of Texas, (E. C. Brand, successor), and Texas State Bank. The plaintiffs, after certain formal allegations as to the capacity of the defendant, Shaw, the incorporation, insolvency and liquidation of defendant, Texas…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kidder v. HallTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  2. State Banking Board v. PilcherTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
  3. State Banking Board v. PilcherCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  4. Argues v. Union Sav. Bank of San JoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  5. City of Harrisburg v. AustinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Balfour v. Gossett, CommissionerTexas Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Brand v. Lindale Canning Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  3. Gossett v. GreenTexas Commission of Appeals · 1941
  4. Gossett v. GreenTexas Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Harrisburg National Bank v. SkinnerOregon Supreme Court · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API