Harrisburg National Bank v. Skinner
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLusk, J.
In the Anew that we take of the legal question arising under the affirmative allegations of the answer, the substance, of which has been stated, we find it unnecessary to determine whether or not the contract or the conduct of the. defendant bank under the contract created a trust relationship between the two banks with respect to moneys received by the Junction City Bank in excess of the deposit liability and not accounted for to the plaintiffs. The undisputed testimony established that the plaintiffs have never filed a claim with the superintendent of banks and have not, in any other…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mann v. Bank of GreenfieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1929
- Commerce Trust v. Farmers' Exch. Bk. of GallatinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
- Brand v. Conner & McRaeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
- School District No. 62 v. SchrammOregon Supreme Court · 1933
- Farm & Home Savings & Loan Ass'n v. HowardMissouri Court of Appeals · 1930
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- First National Bank v. ConnollyOregon Supreme Court · 1942
- First National Bank v. ConnollyOregon Supreme Court · 1942