Legal Opinion
Carolina Aluminum Co. v. Federal Power Commission
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided June 6, 1938No. 4318PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PARKER, Circuit Judge.
This is a petition to review and set aside a finding of the Federal Power Commission to the effect that interstate or foreign commerce would be affected by the proposed construction by petitioner of a hydroelectric power project on the Yadkin River near Tuckertown, North Carolina. On May 29, 1937, petitioner filed with the Commission a declaration of intention to construct the project. A hearing was thereupon held by the Commission and much evidence was taken bearing upon the issue as to whether the navigability of the Pee Dee River in its navigable portion would be…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Philadelphia Co. v. StimsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Federal Power Commission v. Metropolitan Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. Los Angeles & Salt Lake RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- United States v. GriffinSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Piedmont & Northern Railway Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Cárdenas Maxán v. RodríguezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1987
- United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Federal Power Commission. Michigan Consolidated Gas Co. v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
- Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
- The California Oregon Power Company, a Corporation v. Federal Power Commission, the State of Oregon, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
- Peterson Properties, Del Rio Plaza Shopping Center v. Valencia County Valuation Protests BoardNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1976
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.