Legal Opinion

Campodonico v. Oregon Improvement Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 1891No. 13606PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Luis Obispo County, and from an order denying a new trial. . The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

The Court.

Action to recover damages for the conversion, by defendant, of certain personal property, con*567sisting of beans and barley grown upon land farmed by one Dodge, in the county of San Luis Obispo, in 1888. Judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff, and from this, and an order denying its motion for a new trial, defendant appeals.

The court below found, in substance, that in May, 1888, the said Dodge duly mortgaged to plaintiff the said beans and barley then growing to secure the sum of fifteen hundred dollars and interest, which mortgage was properly recorded; that between May 31,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Byrnes v. HatchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Catlin v. HoffmanU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon · 1874

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Summerville v. Stockton Milling Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Crosby v. Fresno Fruit Growers' Co.California Court of Appeal · 1916
  3. People v. EmeryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. I. S. Chapman & Co. v. UleryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  5. Campodonico v. Santa Maria Bean & Grain Co.California Court of Appeal · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API