Legal Opinion
Hansen v. Barlow
Utah Supreme Court
Decided June 20, 1969No. 11230PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CALLISTER, Justice:
The former State Attorney General, Phil L. Hansen, in his official capacity, initiated a declaratory judgment action to determine the constitutionality of the 1967 -amend ments to Sections 36-4-12 and 36-4-7, U.C.A.1953, insofar as they provided for payment of a per diem and expenses to the members of the Legislative Council and authorized the Council to employ a staff and fix their salaries. The court below granted a motion to dismiss the action for the reason that the Attorney General had no standing to bring the action and was therefore not a proper party plaintiff.
This…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Late Corp. of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Darling Apartment Co. v. SpringerSupreme Court of Delaware · 1941
- Wilentz v. HendricksonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1944
- Wilentz v. HendricksonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1943
- State v. FinchSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Attorney General v. Burning Tree Club, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
- State Ex Rel. Derryberry v. Kerr-McGee CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Hancock v. PaxtonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1974
- State v. GallionUtah Supreme Court · 1977
- Hansen v. Utah State Retirement BoardUtah Supreme Court · 1982
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.