Legal Opinion
North American Financial Corp. v. Amgrar Gesellschaft Für Farmlagen, mbH
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided January 18, 1989No. Civ. 4-88-687PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
DIANA E. MURPHY, District Judge.
Plaintiff North American Financial Corp. (NAFCO) brought this action in Hennepin County District Court for breach of an option contract to purchase leased equipment. Defendants are Amgrar Gesellschaft für Farmlagen, mbH (Amgrar), the lessee and holder of an option to purchase, and Donald Hershey and Hershey Equipment Company, Inc., the guarantors of the lease and contract. The action was removed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1446, alleging diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Presently before the court is defendants’ motion to…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Scullin Steel Company v. National Railway Utilization Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- S.B. Schmidt Paper Co. v. a to Z Paper Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
- Gray v. Lewis & Clark Expeditions, Inc.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1998
- Krambeer v. EisenbergDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1996
- Memorial Hospital System v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of ArkansasDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1993