Legal Opinion

Port Huron MacHinery Co. v. Wohlers

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 13, 1928PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

De Graff, J. —

This case involves an alleged contract containing a stipulation for liquidated damages. If a contract did result, there can be no question that the plaintiff is entitled to recover, since the terms of the 7 aueged contract clearly fix the amount recover able by plaintiff in case of a breach. See Pace v. Zellmer, 194 Iowa 516.

This appeal presents bnt one question. It is a question of law, and calls for the statement of the applicable legal principle. But, like every other case, the governing principle arises out of a fact situation. It is said in Steffes v. Hale, 204 Iowa 226:

“It…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. McDermott v. MahoneySupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  2. Hankins v. YoungSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  3. McCormick Harvesting Machine Co. v. MarkertSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
  4. Kingman & Co. v. WatsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
  5. McCormick Harvesting Machine Co. v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Northwestern Engineering Co. v. EllermanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Ronald Dwight Kunde v. Estate of Arthur D. Bowman and Diane EngelkinsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2018
  3. Drake v. BlockSupreme Court of Iowa · 1956
  4. McCarter v. UbanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1969
  5. Kladivo v. MelbergSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API