Coleman v. Bland

Arvita M. Coleman [“Former Wife”] appeals the final judgment dissolving her marriage to Michael Bland [“Former Husband”]. We find no reversible error in any of the issues raised on appeal, save one. Among the issues in dispute between these parties was the question whether any part of Former Husband’s pension was a marital asset. The trial court made no finding in the final judgment concerning whether *796this asset was marital or non-marital, as required by section 61.075(8), Florida Statutes (2009). Former Wife contends on appeal that the lack of findings constitutes reversible error as to this…