Legal Opinion
Coleman v. Bland
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided February 29, 2016No. 5D14-3779PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPalmer, J.
Arvita M. Coleman, the former wife, appeals the trial court’s order entered on September 22/2014, upon remand from this court. Determining that the trial court erred in ruling that the value of-the marital portion of the former husband!s pension plan was de minimis, we reverse.
Michael Bland, the former husband, worked for the Yonkers School Board of Education for approximately 31 years.' After 49 weeks of marriage to the former wife, the former husband retired from this position. After a 39-month marriage, the former husband filed a petition seeking dissolution of the parties’ marriage. The…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bardowell v. BardowellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
- Coleman v. BlandDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
- Locke v. LockeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
3Cited by5 opinions
- Brady v. BradyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
- Coleman v. BlandDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- Nugent v. NugentDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
- Stephens v. WhittakerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
- Stufft v. StufftDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018