Legal Opinion

Coleman v. Bland

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 5, 2014No. 5D10-1326PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ON MOTION TO REVIEW TRIAL COURT’S POST-MANDATE AWARD OF ATTORNEYS FEES AND DENIAL OF MOTION TO TAX COSTS

LAMBERT, J.

Pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.400(c), Arvita M. Coleman (“Former Wife”) seeks review of a trial court order that she contends awarded her attorney’s fees, but denied her motion for taxation of appellate costs.

Former Wife previously appealed the final judgment, later amended, dissolving her marriage to Michael Bland (“Former Husband”). At that time, we found no reversible error as to any of the issues raised, except as to whether any part of Former Husband’s…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pellar v. Granger Asphalt Paving, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  2. ALTAMONTE HITCH & TRAILER v. U-Haul Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  3. Coleman v. BlandDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  4. Markin v. MarkinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Coleman v. BlandDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API