Legal Opinion
Cottone v. ZONING HEARING BD. OF POLK TP.
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided August 15, 2008No. 292 C.D. 2007PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Judge LEAVITT.
Mary Ann Cottone (Cottone) and Reflection Builders Enterprise, Inc. (collectively, Landowners) appeal an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Monroe County (trial court) holding that Cottone cannot build a house on her .3-acre lot because the zoning ordinance requires a minimum one-acre lot for a house served by well water and on-lot sewage treatment. Cottone’s lot was part of a subdivision plan approved by the.* County and the Township but never developed before the Township enacted the zoning ordinance in question. The trial court affirmed the decision of the Polk…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Valley View Civic Ass'n v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Larsen v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- West Goshen Township v. CraterCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Jacquelin v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Tinicum Township v. JonesCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Hafner v. Zoning Hearing Board of Allen TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Pennsy Supply, Inc. v. Zoning Hearing Board of Dorrance TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Slice of Life, LLC and v. Kleyman v. Hamilton Twp. ZHB and Hamilton Twp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- J.J. Loughran v. Valley View Developers, Inc. ~ Appeal of: Estate of Milton Parker, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- In Re Appeal of MoyerCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.