Hermetics Switch, Inc. v. Sales
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
OPALA, Justice:
The narrow first-impression question to be answered is whether the decision of a three-judge panel of the Workers’ Compensation Court which vacates the trial judge’s award or order and directs him to rehear the case is to be treated as reviewable under the provisions of 85 O.S.Supp. 1977 § 3.6 B, when the error assigned for review is that the decision is fatally defective on the face of the proceedings because the relief granted by the panel is clearly in excess of that sought before it by the employer as the sole appealing party. Our answer is in the negative. We hold that the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- McCallum Forber v. OwensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Reid v. Phillips Petroleum CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
- State Ex Rel. Com'rs of Land Office v. SuttonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- Armour & Co. v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
- Sheegog v. Incorporated Town of LindsaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Parks v. Norman Municipal HospitalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Arrow Tool & Gauge v. MeadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
- ROBINSON v. FAIRVIEW FELLOWSHIP HOME FOR SENIOR CITIZENS, INC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
- Jackson v. FreemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Yeatman v. Northern Oklahoma Resource Center of EnidSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.